logo
Funny Animals Interesting Freaky Pop Culture

Manager Asks If Firing An Employee Returning From Maternity Leave Makes Them A Bad Manager

by Damjan

The intersection of employment, fairness, and family life presents a challenging ethical landscape for managers to navigate. A recent anonymous post on Reddit revealed a dilemma faced by a team leader who felt compelled to fire an employee, Jess, upon her return from maternity leave.

[ADVERTISEMENT]

The post has sparked a fierce debate about the morality of such a decision, its implications on workplace dynamics, and the fairness towards both the new and existing team members. The manager found themselves caught in an ethical quandary due to budgetary restrictions imposed by the company.

[ADVERTISEMENT]

With the inability to maintain a seven-person team, the manager had to decide between retaining Jess, a recently returned mother, or a new hire who had replaced her temporarily. The manager cited several reasons for their choice.

These included the new employee's lower salary, his familiarity with ongoing projects, and the positive rapport he'd built with clients. Additional factors were Jess’s absence from the field for a prolonged period and her potential difficulty in adapting back to work.

The situation spotlights the difficult balance employers must strike between what seems best for the company and what feels fair and ethical on a personal level. On the one hand, it might appear rational to keep the employee who is more cost-effective and up-to-date with current projects.

On the other hand, firing an employee who has just returned from maternity leave raises questions about workplace discrimination and the social responsibility a company has towards its employees.

OP asks:

OP asks:
Reddit
[ADVERTISEMENT]

OP found themselves caught in an ethical quandary due to budgetary restrictions imposed by the company

OP found themselves caught in an ethical quandary due to budgetary restrictions imposed by the company
Reddit
[ADVERTISEMENT]

With the inability to maintain a seven-person team, the manager had to decide between retaining Jess, a recently returned mother, or a new hire who had replaced her temporarily.

With the inability to maintain a seven-person team, the manager had to decide between retaining Jess, a recently returned mother, or a new hire who had replaced her temporarily.
Reddit
[ADVERTISEMENT]

The manager cited several reasons for their choice.

The manager cited several reasons for their choice.
Reddit
[ADVERTISEMENT]

To OP, they make sense:

To OP, they make sense:
Reddit
[ADVERTISEMENT]

However, that doesn't prevent them from feeling bad about it:

However, that doesn't prevent them from feeling bad about it:
Reddit
[ADVERTISEMENT]

Redditors were not kind on OP:

Redditors were not kind on OP:
Reddit
[ADVERTISEMENT]

This Redditor has a point:

This Redditor has a point:
Reddit
[ADVERTISEMENT]

Is OP thinking about what other women in the company would think?

Is OP thinking about what other women in the company would think?
Reddit

"You're not going save money after she takes legal action"

Reddit

This is a good question:

This is a good question:
Reddit

The last paragraph is so very true. Unfortunately, most people fail to see their sexism

The last paragraph is so very true. Unfortunately, most people fail to see their sexism
Reddit

Doesn't look good for OP:

Doesn't look good for OP:
Reddit

The bottom line is:

The bottom line is:
Reddit

Jess's reaction—calling her manager derogatory names and refusing the offer of a recommendation letter—highlights the emotional charge of such decisions. For a new mother already facing the challenges of parenthood, losing a job can be devastating both financially and emotionally.

While the details are scant and jurisdictions may vary, firing an employee returning from maternity leave can sometimes be illegal or at least open the door to litigation. Such laws are designed to prevent discrimination against women who have recently given birth and are returning to the workplace.

While the manager may argue that the decision was made for the benefit of the team and the company, the question remains: at what cost? Their company might end up paying a lot more in legal fees.

Share this article:

Facebook icon Pinterest icon Tumblr icon Link icon Twitter icon

Related Articles

Summer Citrus Drinks Could Leave You With Painful 'Margarita Burn'

Summer Citrus Drinks Could Leave You With Painful 'Margarita Burn'

Zyn Pouch Sparks Bigger Questions About In-Air Nicotine Rules

Zyn Pouch Sparks Bigger Questions About In-Air Nicotine Rules

Disney Dream Passengers Witness Ocean Rescue

Disney Dream Passengers Witness Ocean Rescue

UPenn Eyes Trans Athlete Ban Sparked by Lia Thomas Investigation

UPenn Eyes Trans Athlete Ban Sparked by Lia Thomas Investigation

Nancy Mace Owes Voters Professional Attire

Nancy Mace Owes Voters Professional Attire

Pippa Middleton Denied Royal Box Seat with Kate After Wimbledon Rule Breach

Pippa Middleton Denied Royal Box Seat with Kate After Wimbledon Rule Breach

Anna Wintour Steps Aside as Vogue’s Editor, Still Holds Reins

Anna Wintour Steps Aside as Vogue’s Editor, Still Holds Reins

FDA Finalizes Guidance on Heart Risks Linked to COVID-19 Vaccines

FDA Finalizes Guidance on Heart Risks Linked to COVID-19 Vaccines

Categories

Funny Animals Interesting Freaky Pop Culture

Business

About Us Advertise Contact Us

Legal

Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy DMCA Removal
 Logo
About Us Privacy DMCA Removal Contact Us Terms Funny Animals Interesting Freaky Pop Culture

© 2025 - All Rights Reserved

 logo

Sign In to

facebook icon Sign in with facebook
facebook icon Sign in with google

Or sign in with email

Need an account? Sign Up

Forgot Password?

By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service

 logo

Sign Up to

Already have an account? Sign In

By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service

Edit profile

User Photo