Choosing Crumb Over My Boyfriend: AITA for Standing Firm on My Pet Preference?
A 28-year-old woman thought her “Crumb” problem would be a quick, awkward talk. Instead, it turned into a full-blown relationship standoff where her boyfriend Kyle went from apologizing to accusing her of “choosing a stupid animal” over him.
The complication? This was never really about one offhand comment. It was about Kyle kissing her like it was no big deal, even though he was also trying to kiss a cat, and she was drawing a hard line on hygiene and comfort. She wanted a clean break after he said things like punish and crate, and he wanted to compromise by brushing teeth and washing her face after he touched Crumb.
Then Kyle asked if she was seriously breaking up with him over Crumb, and that’s when the whole vibe flipped.
Original Post
Hello! [OG POST](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/rodjrq/aita_for_standing_firm_on_my_lack_of_hygiene_and/) First, I want to thank everyone who took the time to respond, upvote, award, & dm me.
I was inundated with responses and really got great feedback from all over the spectrum. It was decided that I was not TA, but there were tons of N A H.
I took every comment to heart. Even ToothbrushGate!
Convo with Kyle: I wanted to talk bc I wanted to hear his reasoning/give a clean break. Honestly, it was a relatively normal, boring conversation...
at first. He apologized for giving me an ultimatum/said that he was just frustrated & would never want to hurt Crumb.
I apologized for laughing at him & for making him feel as though his feelings weren't valid. He said that the "pet thing" was new to him & he wants to work at bonding.
I asked what he meant by punish/crate. He said that by punish he meant spray with water & he didn't realize cats aren't crate animals.
He tried to compromise & say kissing cat's head was gross, but if I brushed my teeth/washed my face after, he would kiss me. The comment I received most was Kyle & I just aren't compatible.
So I said that: although I appreciate his apology & trying to compromise, I don't think in the future it would work. Kyle tried to backpedal a bit & say he can learn to be more flexible, but I kinda got a weird feeling.
I said it isn't fair to either of us to compromise on our comfort. I restated that Crumb is non-negotiable.
He rolled his eyes & asked if I was choosing Crumb over him. He then asked if I was "seriously breaking up with him over a 'stupid animal.'" This shocked me bc it was a 180 of the previous 15 mins.
He said he felt rejected by Crumb and felt if he rejected him first, it would make them even? I said that was concerning bc Crumb is a cat.
He asked how I would feel if he kept kissing animals that weren't me. I said I wouldn't care bc they were animals/not a threat.
He said I was dense & if I clearly didn't care about his boundary of kissing animals, who is to say that I wouldn't kiss everyone. This especially hurt bc I had previously told him about the stigma of being a queer (bisexual) woman and how everyone assumes we cheat/are promiscuous.
I asked if he was jealous of Crumb. He scoffed, said "you're right, this could never work bc you will be a crazy cat lady with no boundaries/hygiene." He said "enjoy being alone forever" & hung up.
Going forward, I will make sure to explain my relationship with my cat to future partners. I need to be with someone that loves animals/at least doesn't feel threatened by them.
Like a lot of you said, I should be with someone that loves both me & Crumb. To answer one of the most asked questions: I sanitized the toothbrush.
I will be getting a new head soon, thanks to my friend. I also got a cap for it.
Thank you for being a part of this journey with me. If you are interested in future updates, I can post them on my own page.
<3 [Cat Tax included :)](https://www.reddit.com/user/AITA_shower/comments/rprxy2/crumbs_cat_tax_for_update/)
Pets can play crucial roles in our lives, often becoming integral parts of our families. Research published in the Journal of Social Issues reveals that pets can enhance emotional well-being and even serve as sources of companionship during relational stress.
However, conflicts can arise when partners disagree on pet-related issues, indicating deeper relational tensions that may need exploration.
Comment from u/knitlikeaboss
Comment from u/eirissazun
After the ToothbrushGate comments and the “Kyle and I just aren’t compatible” verdicts started piling up, OP sat down for the conversation she said she needed.
In this situation, the conflict over pet preference suggests underlying issues around prioritizing personal attachments versus relational commitments. Recognizing this dynamic can help couples navigate these conflicts with greater empathy and understanding.
Comment from u/mecistops
Comment from u/claypolejr
Kyle apologized for the ultimatum and admitted he didn’t realize cats aren’t crate animals, which would have been a decent start if he hadn’t kept pressing for kissing rules.
It’s the same kind of fallout as when the Redditor chose her elderly cat over her allergic girlfriend, sparking massive debate.
Effective Communication Strategies
To address disagreements about pets, open communication is essential. Partners should express their feelings and preferences while also actively listening to each other’s perspectives.
Research in conflict resolution suggests that using reflective listening techniques, such as paraphrasing what the other person has said, can help validate feelings and promote a collaborative approach to finding solutions.
Comment from u/Voshabeus
Comment from u/TZH85
When he rolled his eyes and asked if she was choosing Crumb over him, the apology suddenly sounded less like accountability and more like a negotiation tactic.
Moreover, couples might consider discussing how they can integrate their love for pets into their relationship. Brainstorming ways to honor both partners' preferences can lead to innovative solutions that strengthen the relationship.
This collaborative approach aligns with the principles of relational harmony, emphasizing that mutual respect and compromise are vital in navigating differences.
Comment from u/tailor31415
Comment from u/im-just-k
The moment Kyle framed it as “even” if he rejected Crumb first, OP clocked that he was treating her cat like a math problem, not a living roommate.
Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments section.
Comment from u/canberrastreets
Comment from u/MissAnth
The ongoing debate surrounding the prioritization of pets over partners reveals the complexities of relationships. The original Reddit post highlighted a profound emotional struggle and sparked a wide range of reactions, indicating that such decisions are far from straightforward. The commentary from readers suggests that couples need to engage in open dialogues about their feelings and expectations regarding pets, which can lead to healthier dynamics.
In this case, the responses underscore the importance of empathy and understanding when navigating these difficult choices. The overwhelming sentiment suggests that approaching these discussions collaboratively can fortify the relationship, turning potential conflicts into opportunities for growth and deeper connection.
He might be happier in a different apartment, because Crumb is staying.
For another cat-versus-relationships standoff, see the woman who saved her beloved cat over her estranged sister’s mortgage.
Share this article:
