Karen Plays Victim After Ignoring The Clear "No Dog" Sign
Because apparently the sign was optional, and the dog’s feelings were the only ones that mattered.
The OP wasn’t trying to start drama, she was asking why someone ignored the rules in the first place. The post blew up, and suddenly everyone had a strong opinion, from people who said the OP was right to call it out, to others who argued the business could face health code trouble if the wrong person reported it.
And yes, one commenter really leaned into the chaos by saying the whole thing was “ESH,” because the dog owner and the rule-breaker both share the blame.
Let's dig into the story and find out all that transpired
All the OP was doing was asking why she ignored the no pets sign
It's not hard to not bring your dog to a coffee shop that doesn't allow dogs
The Reddit post went viral with thousands of comments and here are a bunch of the topmost ones
It's outrageous how many pet owners feel entitled to ignore rules because they think their pet is "special"
The OP has every right to complain
This Redditor would have brought the matter to the manager
That’s when OP’s simple question about the “no dog” sign turned into a comment section where everyone started picking sides, hard.
While some people wanted OP to bring it to the manager, others insisted the real issue was that dog owners keep acting like their pets are exempt from basic rules.
The debate got even messier when Redditor Sophronia174 claimed, in her state, it’s a health code violation to have a dog in a shopping cart or on a chair.
Redditor Sophronia174 went against the majority saying...
In my state it’s a health code violation for a dog to be in a shopping cart or on a chair. Dogs have poopy butts they don’t wipe. It’s the dog owner, not the business that would be fined if a health official were to see them. Personally, I love dogs and would have asked to pet them but a bakery where people are eating isn’t dog friendly. ESH.
Why is it okay for her to break the rules but not okay for the OP to say something?
As simple as it can get
The ramifications are that the health department shuts down the business
There are a lot of people that are allergic to dogs
Then the thread circled back to the point everyone couldn’t ignore, people get allergic in enclosed spaces, and pretending the sign doesn’t exist has consequences.
Many people have dog allergies, and there are valid reasons why pets shouldn't be allowed in enclosed areas unless they are service animals. People who choose to act antisocially must endure the relatively slight penalty of being called out.
Some Redditors believe that collective shaming is the only option at this point because the employees are likely extremely exhausted from trying to convince individuals to behave appropriately. The OP was declared not the AH and that's a wrap.
The OP wasn’t the problem, the dog owner was, and that bakery definitely did not sign up for this level of nonsense.
For more dog-rule drama, see how a brazen dog-mom flaunted her pooch in a no-dog restaurant.
Share this article:
