Redditor Updates Stray Cat's Chip Information After Being Tossed Around By Different Supposed Owners, Refuses To Give The Cat Back
A stray cat got tossed around like a lost package, and somehow the “owners” kept changing. In the middle of it all, one Redditor ends up with the cat, discovers a chip, and then learns the chip might point to an old owner who is not the same person claiming him now.
Here’s the mess: the cat was taken to the vet for a chip check, and the scan showed an older owner. Meanwhile, the person who adopted him from Petco says she never registered him, so the vet cannot pull up her info. Add in the ethics of who actually owns a living creature, plus the OP already spending money on the cat, and you’ve got a situation that spiraled fast.
And then the call came in, telling OP to bring him back, and everything got even messier.
The story's title
They took the cat to the vet for a chip check, and they said he had a chip that showed his old owner
The person who adopted the cat from Petco said she didn’t even register him, so the vets can’t pull the information up
The whole thing starts when the vet scan points to an older owner, while the Petco adopter insists her name was never registered anywhere.
Ethics of Pet Ownership
The question of pet ownership can be complicated by ethical considerations, especially when the pet's well-being is at stake. A study published in the Journal of Animal Ethics discusses the moral implications of keeping a pet that may not belong to you.
This situation raises critical questions about responsibility and the emotional attachment that can develop between humans and animals.
There's a lot more the OP is planning to do, like getting the cat's tummy checked for those stitches, but it just sucks
OP has offered the following explanation for why they think they might be the a-hole:
I put the cat under my name on 24Petwatch because he has a chip already, but it wasn’t the current Petco owner.
It made me the asshole because they called me today to bring him back since the owner wants him back, and I put him under my name at 24Petwatch even though the shelter says the Petco owner has her name on it, but she doesn’t. The only owner that appears is the old one, which she had confused with her cat. So I decided to keep him because of the money spent.
Let's head into the comments section and find out what other Redditors have to say regarding the story
It was later discovered that the cat had an owner
That’s when OP admits they put the cat under their own name on 24Petwatch, even though the shelter says the Petco owner is the one who should be listed.
It’s hard not to think of the lady threatening legal action against her ex-flatmate, after the cat she abandoned years ago went missing.
Research indicates that individuals often develop strong emotional bonds with animals, which can create moral dilemmas when ownership is ambiguous.
In this case, the Redditor's reluctance to return the cat may reflect a deeper attachment that complicates the ethical considerations involved.
The OP replied to the above comment, and here it is below
The conversation continues with this Redditor telling the OP to figure some things out first
Telling them the cat will be surrendered after being reimbursed
After the call to bring the cat back since “the owner wants him,” OP decides the old chip info must be a mix-up and keeps him anyway, citing the money spent.
Now in the comments, someone pushes OP to “figure some things out first,” and the plan being floated is to surrender the cat only after reimbursement.
Understanding the legal implications of pet ownership is crucial in situations like this.
Legally, the cat should be returned to its proper owner, as Redditors say that keeping the cat without their permission could be deemed theft or wrongful possession. It's critical to respect the owner's desires, even if their decision not to return the cat appears perplexing at first.
OP was declared not the AH, and you can share this story with your loved ones to get their own opinions as well.
To address the emotional aspects of this situation, individuals may benefit from engaging in discussions with others involved.
The recent situation surrounding the stray cat that has been tossed between various supposed owners underscores the complex ethics of pet ownership. This case illustrates the need for a nuanced understanding of both emotional attachments and the legal frameworks that govern pet ownership. Such technology is meant to provide clarity in disputes, yet it is evident that emotional ties can complicate these situations. By prioritizing open dialogue, individuals can navigate these tough conversations more effectively, ultimately fostering better relationships with both their pets and fellow community members.
OP might have saved a cat from chaos, but now he’s wondering if he just became the reason it keeps happening.
Wait until you see the missing cat with no chip or collar that sparked a balcony feud.
Share this article:
