Panicked Mom In Disbelief When Her Mother-In-Law Defends Her Dog After He Attacked 9-Month-Old Baby Unprovoked
A 9-month-old baby got attacked out of nowhere, and the shock did not stop at the bite. OP was already trying to process the unprovoked mauling, but then her mother-in-law stepped in and defended the dog like it was the victim. Still, MIL blamed the baby’s presence, insisted she wanted OP and her daughter in her life, and even disowned her son for punishing the dog.
Now OP is stuck wondering if her MIL can ever admit what happened, or if she’s about to become the next person at risk during a family visit.
OP made it clear that the attack was unprovoked. Her baby didn't tug on the dog's fur, she wasn't playing with his toys, nor was she anywhere near his food bowl.
OP is unsure if her feelings toward her MIL and her dog are justified.
She feels betrayed that her MIL defended her dog after what he did to her granddaughter.
The Complexity of Attachment and Pet Ownership
The attachment that individuals form with pets can sometimes be as significant as those formed with humans. Our relationships with pets often fulfill emotional needs that may not be met elsewhere.
This attachment can lead to protective instincts over pets, even in situations where their behavior poses risks.
Understanding this emotional connection can help explain why the mother-in-law defended her dog despite its aggressive behavior.
She also feels guilty when she thinks that the dog should be put down for mauling her child.
MIL said she still wants OP and her daughter in her life, but disowned her son for punishing her dog. OP doesn't know if she has it in her to be around MIL.
MIL can't even acknowledge her dog's dangerous behavior. She shouldn't be trusted around OP's baby again.
OP makes it clear the attack was unprovoked, but MIL treated it like a misunderstanding the baby caused.
The incident involving the mother's mother-in-law defending her dog after the attack on her 9-month-old daughter highlights a troubling dynamic that can arise in family relationships when pets are involved. The mother-in-law's immediate loyalty to her dog, despite its aggressive behavior, is emblematic of how emotional attachments to pets can cloud judgment. In this case, the mother-in-law's willingness to blame the baby rather than acknowledge the dog's actions illustrates a common psychological phenomenon where pet owners may misinterpret concerning behaviors as innocuous. This misplaced loyalty not only endangers the child but also strains familial bonds. Addressing such problematic behaviors is essential to ensure the safety and well-being of all family members, especially the most vulnerable ones.
She could have committed to behavioral training for her dog, but she completely absolved him of any responsibility.
A responsible pet owner would do everything to ensure their dog is safe to be around humans; MIL doesn't belong in that category.
She can't even care enough to make sure her family is safe around her dog. I doubt she concerns herself with thoughts of other people.
The moment MIL defended the dog instead of acknowledging the danger, OP’s trust started to crack.
The situation described in the article reveals a complex interplay of loyalty and denial that can arise when a beloved pet is involved in a troubling incident. The mother-in-law's immediate defense of her dog, despite its unprovoked attack on a vulnerable 9-month-old baby, underscores a strong attachment to the animal that surpasses her concern for the child's safety. This reaction is not uncommon, as individuals often prioritize their emotional connections over the well-being of others in crises. The mother-in-law’s refusal to acknowledge the gravity of the situation highlights how past experiences and emotional bonds can cloud judgment, leading to a defensive stance that places blame elsewhere, even on the innocent child. Such dynamics can create a rift in family relationships, as the mother grapples with both fear for her daughter and frustration at her mother-in-law’s misplaced loyalty.
This is similar to the mom who tried to burn her daughter’s pet, while her brother sided with her.
OP added a comment. The dog tried to charge at her daughter again. Her husband had to throw the dog out to protect their daughter.
OP made it clear she had no secret agenda against animals. She had dogs herself. She didn't misrepresent how the events happened despite what other Redditors suspected.
Kicking the dog out of the house was the gentlest thing they could have done given what happened moments before. A Redditor said they wouldn't have been as kind.
Things got even messier when MIL disowned her own son for punishing the dog, not for protecting the baby.
For families navigating these complex dynamics, open communication is essential.
This can be achieved through training and socialization of pets, as well as discussions about acceptable behaviors in family settings.
OP and her family are out of her MIL's house.
MIL shared this post on Facebook two days after her dog attacked her defenseless 9-month-old granddaughter.
OP was insulted by MIL's post.
In cases where aggressive behavior is present, seeking professional help from a veterinarian or animal behaviorist can be crucial.
Research shows that behavioral interventions can significantly reduce aggression and improve safety within family environments.
Addressing these issues promptly can prevent escalation and ensure a harmonious coexistence.
The hospital reported the attack to their local Health Department. OP and her husband decided to file a police report and consult a lawyer after they moved out of MIL's house.
MIL's refusal to accept how dangerous her dog could be tells us she won't do anything to correct his behavior.
Pet owners love their dogs. Loving them means training them well enough to keep other people and our pets safe. It doesn't mean ignoring their potentially dangerous nature.
OP can set the record straight with one photo of her baby's injuries.
When MIL's dog attacks another human again, what will happen then? I doubt they will be as forgiving as OP.
OP should definitely preemptively block MIL on everything to avoid further drama.
After MIL refused to name the behavior as dangerous, OP was left deciding whether she could survive being in the same room as her again.
Dogs are great companions when they are trained correctly. MIL is a poor pet owner as long as she refuses to acknowledge her dog can snap at any moment because she refuses to retrain him.
Her misplaced loyalty to her dog cost her any hope for a relationship with her granddaughter. OP and her husband reacted appropriately and admirably when their child's life was literally on the line, despite what MIL said.
The emotional turmoil surrounding pet ownership is vividly illustrated in this distressing incident.
The family dinner might be over, but OP’s real fear is what happens the next time that dog gets a chance to “defend” itself.
Wait till you see the mother-in-law who cropped the Doberman’s ears without permission, and why.
Share this article:
