Future Bride Sets No-Pet Policy For Her Wedding Because Of Her Allergies, Nephew Says He Won’t Attend Without His Service Dog
We're back again today with yet another fantastic Reddit post to look at and this one is straight from the AITA thread that you all know we love covering posts from. We often go over these posts because they're super entertaining and overall have a great vibe, plus the comments are always giving good advice.
People often times come to these threads to get unbiased advice and opinions on what's gong on in their life. So with that being said, we're here looking into a post that was submitted by a woman who's looking to see if she's in the wrong for a decision she made about her wedding.
Essentially, she's making it pet free which wouldn't otherwise be a problem if her nephew didn't have a service dog, which she's still not allowing him to bring. So she's looking to see if she's actually in the wrong for this and should make an exception, or if she's doing what she should.
The main reason is that she's allergic to dogs, which might be reason enough for some of you, so we'll just have to see. But ultimately, we're going to dive into the full post, plus all the comments to see what the full story and verdict is.
OP starts off her post by telling us she's getting married and then she goes into some details on what their agreement was, and what the problem is.
u/bdkauchsShe is standing her ground, but essentially wants to know if she's wrong and should make some sort of exception for her nephew and his service dog.
u/bdkauchsPeople came to the comments with lots to say and ultimately, they started by saying that OP is NTA and that the nephew might just be SOL.
Agreeable_Tale1305Then people came to explain what an allergic reaction could consist of and why this might be a big problem if he brings the dog to the wedding.
JCaerso92This is something to consider too because allergies can be very rough. It might not seem like a big deal to others, but for the bride this is her day.
LunaMunaLagoonaThis is true too but honestly she may have said that simply because of her being allergic and making that decision was safest.
0biterdictaSome people ultimately told her that she can do whatever she wants because it's her wedding and nobody can tell her any different. If they don't like it, then they can not attend.
my80saddictionThe allergies are what set people to their verdict mostly. If it had been any other circumstance then she might actually be TA but in this case, she's not.
CautiousFault9416
Basically everyone is agreeing that she's NTA and she has free will to make whatever rules she wants for her wedding, including this one.
S1159P
It does suck for others but hopefully they will be understanding and understand where the bride is coming from.
sc0tth
This is a truly difficult situation. People really think that OP is NTA for this, and we have to agree.
I fit hadn't been for her allergies then things might be different, but allergies are no joke, and on her wedding day, that would be a no from us.
Do you agree with the verdict, or do you think she should make accommodations?
