35 Landlords Who Seriously Failed Their Tenants, And You Are Going To Love To Hate Them
![35 Landlords Who Seriously Failed Their Tenants, And You Are Going To Love To Hate Them](https://static.pupperish.com/posts/465f5e7188ee4d83bcdabb9f51d0d219_24254_400.jpg)
Sometimes exceptions need to be made, but then again, it's her wedding so she can do what she wants.
We're back again today with yet another fantastic Reddit post to look at and this one is straight from the AITA thread that you all know we love covering posts from. We often go over these posts because they're super entertaining and overall have a great vibe, plus the comments are always giving good advice.
People often times come to these threads to get unbiased advice and opinions on what's gong on in their life. So with that being said, we're here looking into a post that was submitted by a woman who's looking to see if she's in the wrong for a decision she made about her wedding.
Essentially, she's making it pet free which wouldn't otherwise be a problem if her nephew didn't have a service dog, which she's still not allowing him to bring. So she's looking to see if she's actually in the wrong for this and should make an exception, or if she's doing what she should.
The main reason is that she's allergic to dogs, which might be reason enough for some of you, so we'll just have to see. But ultimately, we're going to dive into the full post, plus all the comments to see what the full story and verdict is.
This is a truly difficult situation. People really think that OP is NTA for this, and we have to agree.
I fit hadn't been for her allergies then things might be different, but allergies are no joke, and on her wedding day, that would be a no from us.
Do you agree with the verdict, or do you think she should make accommodations?